PROMPTESY

Editorial Policy

How Promptesy selects, writes, reviews and improves prompt content.

Last updated: August 12, 2026

Purpose

The editorial policy exists to keep the library useful for people first. Search visibility never replaces originality, clarity or practical value.

Prompt selection

We prioritize prompts with a clear outcome, a realistic use case and enough context to be adapted. We avoid near-identical variations created only to increase page count.

Article standards

Long-form sections should explain the prompt rather than simply repeat it. Where useful, an article covers purpose, features, setup, customization, limitations and examples.

AI-assisted drafting

AI tools may assist research, outlining, ideation or drafting, but published material is reviewed and edited for clarity, accuracy and usefulness. Generated text is not treated as automatically correct. Where the role of automation would reasonably matter to a reader, Promptesy aims to make that process clear rather than presenting automated output as firsthand reporting.

How we use search and SEO

Search optimization helps people discover useful Promptesy pages, but ranking is not the editorial purpose of a page. We avoid keyword stuffing, doorway pages and near-duplicate prompt variations created only to increase indexed URL counts.

Corrections and updates

When a prompt, tool reference, link or explanation becomes outdated, we may revise the page and update its modification date.

Originality and rights

We do not intentionally publish copied articles or copyrighted material as our own. Rights concerns can be reported through the Copyright page.